Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an adorable little “ham sandwich”. Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a big but very loyal companion. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a heart of gold.
A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a closed attraction, public officials and animal rights activists.
But those working directly with the whales say the heated debate over their fate often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who interact with them daily.
After the national authorities prevented the export of the belugas to China, the controversial amusement park near the famous falls where they are kept stated it would consider to end their lives unless the government covers the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an increasingly precarious situation.
Scientists say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and social skills suggest they are deeply intelligent animals – something Kristy Burgess observed directly.
She spent several years as a whale caretaker, a position that entailed gaining confidence of the sea creatures.
“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”
Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless surprised by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She cultivated a deep bond for two female belugas with opposing temperaments.
“One whale accepted me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each transformed the way I perceive connection.”
Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a background of growing public opposition to their captivity.
During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park ascribes to natural mortality, but which advocates say reflects the poor conditions in which they were kept.
The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is breaking off from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they grab fragments and swim around with chunks in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”
The park did not comment to a inquiry, but in the past claimed: “The whales … obtain far better veterinary services and constant care than any human in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”
The former employee was fired from the facility in recent months following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the park thought information of the incident were shared to the press and she was let go shortly thereafter.
The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and current and former trainers in distress. She says the park’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” task, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “considerable manpower”, trucks and heavy equipment.
“It cannot happen in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess supports calls for the whales to be transferred immediately from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.
In the autumn, Canada’s fisheries minister rejected a request to send the whales to China.
“Allowing the application would have meant a continued situation in enclosure and a return to performance for audiences,” the official commented. “As the public, we know that whales are meant for the wild, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience permit an transfer that would continue the conditions these belugas have suffered.”
But the former trainer said the minister’s statements reveal a wider incorrect perception of the facts of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The people needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”
As decision makers attempt to find a solution, ideas have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of nourishment for local populations.
A proposed refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has been highly debated. The future facility, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a permanent solution for some of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an experiment” in the whales’ fate.
Some experts say the possibility of a sanctuary reflects a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a workable solution in the short term.
The project lead, head of the plan, said the site will replicate the mental engagement and diet the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|